A careful first reviewer for your manuscript
Before your supervisor or a journal sees it, get a review like a referee’s: major and minor comments on your argument, methods, evidence and clarity, each placed where it applies.
Why use ai peer review
Structured feedback
Major and minor comments, with a short summary of strengths and weaknesses.
In context
Comments sit on the passage they are about, so you can fix them in place.
Fix or dismiss
Resolve each comment in one click and keep track of what is left.
How it works
Open your draft
Write in WriteOrbit or open your Word file.
Run peer review
Choose peer review in the Review panel.
Work through it
Fix, reply to or dismiss each comment.
What goes in, what comes out
You give it
- A manuscript, thesis chapter, proposal or essay
You get
- A summary review
- Major and minor comments in the text
Good to know
- It does not predict journal acceptance or replace expert review.
- It cannot verify your data or rerun your analysis.
An example
You enter
A 6,000-word empirical paper.
WriteOrbit returns
Major: “The sample is drawn from one school; the conclusion generalises to all secondary students.” Minor: “Define ‘engagement’ before first use.”
Questions
More in the help center.
Is it as good as a human reviewer?
No. It is a useful first reader that catches common problems early. It does not replace your supervisor or a journal’s reviewers.
Is my manuscript kept private?
Yes. Your documents are private unless you share them, and they are not used to train AI.
Free tools for this
They work right on the page, no account needed.
Related features
Try it in the editor, free
No credit card needed. Upgrade when you need more.